View the video above and answer the questions below thoughtfully
complete with details from the talk.
1. How has the configuration of cities
changed throughout history?
2. Which invention does Mr.Larson claim
permanently changed the way cities were configured in the US?
3. What is the difference between a
city and a sprawl?
4. Why does Mr. Larson prefer the
way European cities are configured? Explain.
5. Which technological innovation/
invention impressed you the most and would help "make cities more about
people"? Explain.
6. How do the technological innovations/
inventions presented in the talk address the trends occurring in cities now and
in the future?
7. To what extent do the technological
innovations/ inventions presented in this talk solve problems? or create new
problems?
8. To what extent would Ms. Carter
and Ms. Khan agree or disagree with Mr. Larson's ideas? Explain using details
from all the talks.
9. Which ideas would you like to
implement into your "future city"? Why?
test test
ReplyDelete1) The configuration of cities changed through tout history by having more buildings and multiple ways of transportation.
Delete2) Mr. Larson claims that cars change cities.
3) A city is where people choose or want to live.
4) Mr. Larson prefers the way European cities are configured.
5) The invention that impressed me the most is the none stop making of roads to help the people travel.
6) The mini mart car
7) The inventions presented solve problems or create them by people who don't have one , want one.
8) I agree, to create more green space
1. the configuration of cities has become more urbanized since industrialization
ReplyDelete2.Mr larson claims cars changed cities
3.a city is a place where people choose to live and a sprawl is an outward growth of the population in that city,
4.mr larson prefers European cities because all of the towns are within walking distance and are located close to shops everyone can access.
5.the new mobility parkway made the city more about people by creating a green space for people to relax workout and ride bikes.
6.the new mini smart car address trends occuring now because with a smaller car it is easier to find parking in a crouded city. it could help cities in the future aswell by having less clutter on the streets.
7.The technological invention of the motor parkway addresses the concerns about less space and a walkway to get from place to place but could also be dangerous and isnt the best location.
8.ms carter and ms khan would agree with mr larson in respect to creating more green spaces and everyone being able to get to stores with equal access.
9. i would like to use the idea of the new car in my city. i think its pretty cool how it transforms to a smaller car and im sure it saves on gas. it will probably bring the pedestrian accident rate down as well considering the car can communicate with pedestrians while they are crossing the street ect.
1. the configuration of cities has become more urbanized since industrialization because of the changes that people made throughout history.
ReplyDelete2.Mr. larson claims that cars had changed the cities.
3.the difference between a city and a sprawl is that a city is a place where the people choses to live while a sprawl is a growth of a population.
4.mr larson prefers european cities because it has walking distances between the towns and they are also located to places of human needs for example, shops,markets etc...
5.the making of new roads impressed me the most because without these roads people wouldnt be able to travel.
6.the mini smart car because it will help people alot.
7.the mini car might also create problems in the future because alot of people would want to have it and the government would not be able to afford everything.
8.ms carter and ms khan would agree with mr larson because they all talk about environment and how people would feel the way tthey live in.
1) cities designs change because if the environment it'd built on or around. Temperatures change and so does nature everything bends to mother nature.
ReplyDelete2) Mr.Larson claims that cars changed cities and will continue to change cities.
3) a city is a place of opportunity and chance for people looking to make a living. A sprawl however is a huge growth in popukatin in a particular city.
4) Mr.Larson prefers European city designs because they have all resources in walking distance to each other. He uses Paris being mad up of little villages as his evidence of this.
5) the walkway bridge is a safe place for epole with young families to cross saftley and be sure they are going ti make it to the other side.
6) the smart car is definitely an up and coming investment in technology. I don't like them but they will become more comments on the roads in a couple of years.
7) all of these inventions are great inventions but each invention will have its flaws. Who knows that car and be a death trap in an accident or a walkway could collapse but time will tell what happens and what wont.
8)both ms.carter and ms.Kahn would agree with Mr.Larson because they are all trying to achieve environmental awareness and public support of going greener. The three of them together would make a strong adivsary for going green.
9) I would definitely use a European style city just for the convenience for my people. I would avoid using massive cars to ensure the safety of all drivers people with awareness of their surrounding and appreciation for there city will make my city successful
1.The configuration of cities has changed throughout history by cities having more buildings and plenty of transportation for people to go to where they need to go. 2.Mr.Larson claims that cars have changed our cities and will keep on changing our city for more years to come. 3.A city is a place of opportunity and a way for people to make a living. A sprawl is a growth of population in a certain city. 4.Mr.Larson prefers European cities because people can walk and don't need transportation because the shops are close and are near their homes. 5.The parkway,superhighway are good excising roads for joggers and bicyclists because these roadways help them keep their body in shape and helps them burn more calories. 6.The smart car will play a key role in parking because with its minivan wagon coupe small looking size parking will be easier and people would't get so angry because that car can fit in any parking lot. 7.The smart car because people put their money into that car and the government would't have any ideas on how to convince people to not buy the car because of the ignition if that happened anytime sooner than later etc. 8.Both Ms.Carter and Ms.Khan would agree with Mr.Larson because they are all trying to make the world a better place to live in by trying to achieve environmental, transportation, and community support of going greener. 9.I would use the parkway, superhighway for the health for my people. It would help people stay more active and fight off diseases that wouldn't be a little hard for other people to fight back diseases.
ReplyDelete1)>They have changed throughout history by becoming more relied on technology and became much more relied on due to the people wanting to live in the city because of urbanization.
ReplyDelete2)>Mr. larson stated that cars were what permanently change the way cities were configured.
3)>A city is a place where people live because of the its where everybody wants to live cause that the high life.A sprawl is rapid growth of buildings being put in a city due to the rapid population boom.
4)> He prefers their cities because of the easy access to things they need, in a simple walk they would take to a market or store.
5)>The technology that impressed me where the rooms in which the walls moved to any convince you would need to suit your needs. like if you were to sit at a desk the light would auto adjust to a suitable reading light and without any human interference but a sensor was used.
6)>That to reduce traffic and high costing parking space the would have cras that would fold and save you the space and could fit many more. the less space the people use the more they would make for the city make money, and slow down any rapid environmental problems.
7)>They cut down the expenses of not uses space to benefit the growing population that's occurring in cities, where we live now currently.
8)>They would agree with him up until the part in which that more space is need to hold all these buildings being made, ms.khan would draw the line in which why wouldn't we take that parking space as use it to better suit the needs of the people living in that community. and with more cars on the road how would people have more space for them that where ms carter would disagree with his new innovative ideas for a city.
9)>Honestly i would implement mr larson ideas because the more easier access people have in and around their city the more people would say what a good and functional place to live and at an ease of just walking and having places to live where the room suits your needs without any interference of human interaction.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete1. Became more urban
Delete2. Car
3. I don't know
4. The walking distance to towns or shops were short
5.Nothing at all
6. Better life for everyone
7.It was a waste of time
8. They would probably be very happy about this
9. None
1- The configuration of cities has changed throughout history because cities came more urbanized, an increasing population in big cities and in town.
ReplyDelete2- The invention then Mr. Larson claim permanently that change the way cities were The course because of transportation and the way parking takes a lot of space in the USA.
3- The difference between a city and a sprawl is that a city is complex system there's housing and city transportation , and a sprawl is a spreading out of the city's. It's suburbs over more and more rural land.
4- Mr. Larson prefers the way European cities are because everything a person needs is right close to them and there are more than one store in a street Mr. Larson even showed pictures of where there was pharmacy a café and other important stores.
5- The invention that impress me the most is the way the apartments Will be for example he showed a video where they been thinking of making apartment more open space example you you could move walls put out the beds from the walls And when you don't need it just put it right back where it was. This invention really impressed me.
6- The small cars will be an upcoming in the investment and technology because it won't take much space as a regular car and there is going to be more space to park car in a parking lot.
7- I think that the invention that will cause problems is the small car. The smoker will cause problems because of its size only two people could fit in the small car.
8- I think Ms. Carter's and Ms. Khan will agree with Mr. Larson because Ms. Carter's and Ms.khan are trying to do something healthy for the environment, And because there trying to make the city more cleaner and less pollution.
9- Something I would like to add in my future city is The small car because it would take less parking and there will be more space for people to walk. Another thing I will like to add to my future city is the apartments in which you move the walls there will be more space for the people to do there own activity at home
• Llulisa Taveras
1. The configuration of cities were changed throughout history because settlements began with people clustered around in a small village. Villages used to be only 1 mile and at the homes of these villages were where people got entertainment, nursing, work and production. As time passed, industrialization helped centralize Hospitals, Schools, Energy and Entertainment. Due to this, transportation became essential and Villages changed to Towns or Cities.
ReplyDelete2. The invention that Mr. Larson believes permanently changed cities were the auto-network: Cars, Bikes, Buses, etc.
3. A city is a place where place settle down and live or a large town, however a sprawl is the uncontrolled expansion of a city or urban area.
4. Mr. Larson prefers how European cities are configured because in the little areas you walk to, the area is composed of an even distribution of shops, cafes, restaurants and grocery stores.
5. The technological innovation that impressed me the most were the "city-homes" because it had everything that would help you get through the day, in a little space. The movable furniture was also safe in case anything was to get stuck. It "made cities more about people" because it had everything you need in the apartment with smaller spaces and it saved lots of energy.
6. The technological innovations will address trends, because it will lower traffic problems and make traveling less of a problem for everyone all around.
7. The technological innovations solves problems because with the mass sprawl of cities and people wanting to settle in cities, there will need to be more space for people to live. Theses inventions can increase the amount of parking space and apartments in smaller areas by 50%.
8. Ms. Carter and Ms. Khan would both agree with Mr. Larson because they all have a similar goal for the future. Ms. Khan is creating more transportation space for the 350,000 people that walk around Times Square a day as well as the rest of NYC. This contributes to Mr. Larson because he is increasing the amount of space of the streets for smaller transportation. Ms. Carter discussed the bad living environment for the South Bronx. The apartments can make for a better living condition and the less energy that the apartments use can make South Bronx greener.
9. In my future city I would love to implement the futuristic looking apartments. The city-homes is a safe way to live and become dependent if you want a better environment at home with entertainment, a gym and different studios.
The way the configuration of cities changed through out history was that congestion occurred and more people came into already populated areas.The city was designed for different amount of people and cars but things change there more bikes more cars or maybe more people walking on feet.
ReplyDeleteOne of the invention Mr. Larson claim permanently and to configure is small apartments there are coumminties were there are high growing amount of people moving to and people don't wanna live in a small clustered apartment so they created basically moving walls to confine your apartment to any thing you may need or want it to be.
The difference between a city and a sprawl is as well a congested area with smaller shops more rural than a city.
Mr.Larson prefer the way European cities are configured because of how the cities and places are set up.
The intention that impress me is that you can get from city to city easy transportation everything is connected,
The future cities now and the future are gonna try and start a era of better mobility
there can be more problems that arise because of the new way of living when the new generation occur it might not work for them.
Some would agree and disagree with his ideas because some would say its boogies
Some ideas i would like to is easy ways to get around and more places to be able to walk.
1- The configuration of cities changed by having more structures and well environment.
ReplyDelete2- Mr. Larson claims cars have changed the cities.
3-A city is a place people like to live because of the wonderful things around and sprawl is just a growth of the building that is in the city just to rise more population in a particular city.
4- Mr. Larson wants people to be active to the things they need and walk to the stores and the distance to town or stores would be less.
5- The technological inventions have impressed me that would help make cities more care for the people is that making many different ways to travel new road new ways to travel.
6- The mini car because it very useful and help people.
7- The technological inventions doesn't cause problems until you get one or causing by yourself.
8-I would agree to that we add more green space well developed environment.
9- In my city my future city I would make body gyms , homeless houses for poor people , build more structure buildings , keep the city clean and more safer.
- Harwinder Singh
1. cities changed throughout history by urbanization , with buildings and transportation.
ReplyDelete2. The invention that mr.larson says changed the city is cars.
3. the difference between a city and sprawl is that , A city is a place where a person chooses where they want to live and a sprawl is the spread of city buildings and houses into an area that used to be countryside.
4. he prefer the way European cities are configured because it was easy to get to places in a short period of time.
5. the inventions that impressed me the most was the non stop roads and transpotation
6.the mini car thing because it will people more and wont take up much space for the city.
7. i feel like the mini car might be a problem because some people may not be able to buy one.
8. i think they would a agree because wants more green space which means less pollution
9.the mini car because it wont take up much space .
amanda whidbee
1).the configuration of cities changed throughout history by the way people was living,the poor people did not have homes to live in so the poor people starting getting homes in the cities,and the people who had money was put in apartments.
ReplyDelete2).he changed the cities by the way people were liveing.he build and created more space for the people,he created bike lanes and parkeing spaces.
3).a city is were people live and makes theree city a home were they need to eat and sleep.and a sprawl is when things are being created like goring and up grading.
4).mr.larson prefer the way european cities are configured because the city need to be adding stores and markets.
5).the technologie that impressed me the most was when all apartment building well have a technologie with movie walls and creating spaces in the room for the people living there.
6).the cities now are more not at that level yet they well be planing to event the future by what they inventing.
7).it saveing problems for people in the cities because mr.larson wants people to fill more relaxed and more happy for the spaces of parking,apartments being technolog,and the crateing of bikeing spaces.
8).i think that ms.carter and ms.khan agress with mr.larsons ideas because he is putting more thing that people need in order to live like parking spaces,building with technologie apartments and new cars in the citie.
9).i would to take mr.larson ideas because he has more infomation that explains what cities need in order for people to stay,and i could get some ideas from the story that he was explaining for my project.
1. The configuration of cities changed throughout history came more of an urbanization by creating new buildings.
ReplyDelete2. The invention that Mr.Larson claims permanently changed the way cities were configured in the US was the way that cars has changed the cities.
3. The difference between a city and a sprawl is rapid growth of buildings because of the population and everyone can live wherever they want.
4. Mr. Larson prefer the way European cities are configured because everything is close to them, he showed eveidence suych as pictures of restaurants.
5. The technological innovation invention impressed you the most and would help "make cities more about people" was building new buildings with a whole lot of space
6. The technological innovations/ inventions presented in the talk address the trends occurring in cities now and in the future is that they are going to make it a better place by improving their cities.
7. They turn up the expenses of everything because we have a growing population that's occurring in cities.
8. I think Ms. Carter's and Ms. Khan will agree with Mr. Larson because Ms. Carter's and Ms.khan are trying to do good for the city and try to cut down on the gas because it causes pollution.
9. Something I would like to add in my future city is more stores because that is how everyone makes their money and I will also add clean buildings and clean parks, because that what represents a urbanization.
kyle taylor
1. The configuration of cities have changed throughout history because of technological advancements and the need to change city designs due to the growing number of population.
ReplyDelete2.Mr. Larson believes the automotive industry permanently changed the way the United States' cities developed.
3.A city is a place where a vast amount of people can live in a compacted space but still live comfortable, accessible and organized. A sprawl is an unorganized growing of a city to the point where everything is cluttered.
4. Mr.Larson prefers how European cities are configured because everything you need is within close proximity, so close that its within walking distance.
5. The technological advancements that impressed me the most were the city home apartments. This design would allow you to get the most use out of the space that you're giving and is very organized. It also is personable which would really connect to the people living there.
6. The technological inventions discussed in the ted talk would solve modern cities problems of clutter, pollution and would maximize the space of a city.
7. The technological innovations solve the problems of creating organized city layout, automobile and traffic and pollution. It would also create comfortable living while organizing space (city-home). The problems that would arise are affordability and the funds to make these changes.
8. Ms.Carter and Ms.Khan would both agree with Mr.Larson because he proposes a solution for the problems both discussed by Ms.Carter and Ms.Khan. Mr. Larson better living environments and lowers the CO2 emissions the city gives off. He also greatly improves the efficiency of transportation in his proposal. The only issue with his proposal is the funding and how much it will cost.
9. If possible, I would like to include the City-Homes in my future city because of their practicality and efficiency. They allow for a comfortable living environment in not much space. I would also like to make biking a part of my city to lower emissions.
1. The configuration of cities changed by advancement in technology and changing city designs
ReplyDelete2. The invention Mr.Lawson claims permanently changed cities was cars
3. The difference between a city and a sprawl is a sprawl is growth of a population and a city is a place where people live
4. Mr.Larson prefers the way European cities Are configured because it gives easy access to things they needed, walking instead of using transportation
5. The invention that impressed me the most was the walkway bridge because it was safe for families to cross to the other side.
6. The technological inventions addresses the trends now and in the future by reducing traffic and high costing parking spaces that helped the city
7.The technological inventions solve the problems of traffic and creating organized city layouts
8. Ms.Carter and Ms.khan would agree with Mr.Larson because they all want to go green and achieve environmental awareness
9.I would use the city homes in my future city because they are efficient and allow comfortable living for the people.
1- The configuration of city has changed to a more urban area for instance the amount of buildings that have been built and the access to transportation.
ReplyDelete2- Mr. Larson states that the main cause of change in a city is cars, mainly a surplus of cars will cause the city to change to make sure there is efficient way to move throughout the city
3- I believe a city is an urban area where everything is close together and not spread out like a rural. I also believe a sprawl is when the city starts to get to expensive to live in which makes people move out from the city but still in range of the city.
4- Mr. Larson believes that European cities are more accessible due to the close stores and the shot distances between the towns. which makes travel easier for those that don't have access to a form of transportation
5- The invention that impressed me was the Mobility Highway. This invention created a space for walkers, joggers,bicyclist, and people in general. this recreational space will attract people as Ms. Irizarry said "people will sit wherever there is a bench".
6- The Mini car is a good idea because it is affordable and very convenient for someone who lives in the city and likes to drive in the city. The mini car is also Mini it says it right in the name for example, a mini car is half the size of a real car so if there is 20 regular cars parked on one street, 40 Mini cars would be able to fit on the same street.
7- The invention of the mini car can also be a problem on the other hand to. They can be a problem due to people hoe was normally walking before are more than likely going to get a mini car. which will cause more traffic and parking problems.
8- I believe Ms. Carter and Ms. Khan will more than likely agree with Mr. Larson due to they are all trying to make the city a better, cleaner, more efficient city to live in.
9- For my city project i would use the idea of making everything close and easily accessible by car or by walking.
1)The configuration of cities changed becoming more urban and industrialized. More building s, transportation and the design of how the city looks.
ReplyDelete2) The invention Mr.Larson claimed permanently changed the way cities were configured were cars.
3) A city is a place where people choose to live. A sprawl is an outward growth of the population that city.
4) Mr.Larson Prefers European cities because everuthing is in walking distance. For example in Paris there are numerous cafes, stores and pharmacies all 5- 10 minutes away in walking distance.
5) The invention that most impressed me was the apartments. You can turn the space into anything automatically for example a a room can be divided into three parts but with machines instzllex on thd wall to move it you can tudn a office space to a dance studio or a table in the dinning room that can be mechically extended. Instead of 4 people at a table you now have 10 more spaces for a party or luncheon. However basedon how the apartment looks, it may be too expensive.
6) The mini smart car. It will help with parking and it runs on battery. I don't like this concept. Not everyone would likd the car. It is too small. Four people cant fit in the car let alone the car looks like it may not have space for ampersons belongings when they want to travel.
7) The only goodnthing is the apartment for young people and the light sensors.
8) I think Ms. Khan will agree with the car idea because of the spacing on the street and sidewalks. I also think that Ms.Carter will disagree with the apartment. Due to the technology , that cost alot of money and not every young person could afford that. However she may agree to the car and evrything else.
9)In my future city I would like to implement the smart apartments and the walkways. I like the apartments despite the fact that it looks pricy, It does seem like many people who can afford it will definitely put it to use.
The configuration of cities changed throughout history because of more structures and another way to get around and changes to the streets
ReplyDelete2 the invention that he claimed was the way people lived in their city by adding and removing to build new things so that people could exercise without disturbing traffic
3 the difference between the two is that where people eat sleep buy and sometimes sell and reconstructe , a sprawl is where people upgrade and add more and take away in an area
4 he prefers this because most of the places that you would like to go is like right there
5 the technological innovation/invention that impressed me the most was the moving walls because anything room you needed it would be right there and it's not to cluttered
6 the technological innovations / inventions adress the trends because it's going to be a success and that the mini car helps out a lot
7 they solve problems cause there would be less pollution because you would need to pedal it like a bike and cause it don't need gas. Also it would cost less for parking. It would create problems cause it would get tiring after a while. Also cause it probably can cause confusion cause they the same color.
8 I think that they would agree with mr. Larsons ideas because they all have the idea of taking away space from certain places and adding it for the people
9 the ideas I would like to implement in my future city is the moving walls because it would be better to have in my home and cause it be effective around the house.
1) The configuration of cities changing was because cities started developing and more people stared moving and so the cities stared expanding
ReplyDelete2) Mr. Larson thinks the reason why the cities throughout the United States started developing because cars started progressing
3) The difference between a City and Sprawl is that a city is a place were people want to live a sprawl is a area were it was a lot of farming and it is starting to develop in a city
4) Mr. Larson prefers European cities because anything you need is walking distance and the towns are closer to each other that people can walk were ever there trying to go
5) The invention that impressed me the most is the roads because without them we would not have ways to travel back in forth to our destination
6) The cities now and the future would be different it would save up a lot space throughout the city and also we would not have so much pollution a
7) The technological inventions get solved because they would have more room in the city and the would be more organized and want to better there city
8) Ms. Carter and Ms. Khan would agree with Mr. Larson Because all three of them just wanted a better and healthy environment and also more space throughout the city
9) In my future city i would expand the city so there would be more room for people to drive around and also i would have certain areas throughout the city wear it would only be for bikes
1- The configuration of cities have changed because the cities have advanced. They've done this because they start having better technology, the growth of the cities population goes up, and the cities design for buildings and the streets change.
ReplyDelete2- Lawson believes that automobiles has permanently changed the ways U.s cities are configured because it gave people a easier way to travel which corresponded with the growth of population.
3- The difference between a city and a sprawl is a city is where people choose live and work, while the sprawl is the outcome of the cities over population.
4- Mr.Lawson prefers the European cities because every thing is local and is in walking distance. Which is good for the environment and the people health.
5- the super high way impressed me the most. They make cities more for the people because it makes getting around more convenient and it gives bikers a chance to get around with out crossing the high ways.
6- The small cars will be a trend for cities now and in the future because people will soon realize its the best way to drive around. Since the cars are small they wont take a lot of gas, parking will be easier and it will reduce traffic.
7- the new technological inventions save problems because it will cost less for the government to make because the vehicles are small. They could create problems because we are unaware of how safe the cars if there would be a car crash.
8- The inventions spoken about today would be ideal to Mr.Carter and Ms.khan because they all benefit the people, the help with pollution and dont cause a lot.
9- I would add the super high ways and mini cars to my future city because they seem, low cost and benefits the people to be active and well satisfied.
-Deanna Beckum
Honor Walker
ReplyDelete1. the configuration of cities have changed throughout history by the inventions of new technology and growth of population
2. the invention that permanently changed the way cities were configured in the U.S. is the use of vehicles giving people a way to travel around the city
3. a city is an area where is large in population and people choose to live in a certain area. a sprawl is an area made due to and overcrowding of a city.
4. Mr. Larson prefers the European city configurations because everything is close by, walking distance, and it takes care of the human needs of its citizens by a eco friendly environments and where good health is valued
5. the technological innovation that impressed me the most was the high line in NYC. i find that so amazing how they took an old railway and made it into something beautiful where people can come and enjoy.this greatly makes the city more about people in different aspects such as how people view the city and how they can enjoy the city.
6. the innovations in this talk address the trends occuring in cities now and in the future because i feel that we will keep advancing. for example the flying cars will be next up in the future. this is based on the cars we now have. also with the use of these flying cars we can see a decline in traffic on the ground and maybe more space for nature and people.
7. these innovations can solve problems because like i stated previously, we can see a decline in traffic and more more room for people . it can cause problems also because of the new innovation. weve never tried them before so you may have side defects and we may not know how to address and fix them
8. i think Ms. Carter and Ms. Khan would both agree with mr.Larson because again they all have that one aspect that their trying to help revamp. they all want to revamp or cities. even though they may not all be for a certain area, the idea is there.
9. i would love to use the high line and the super high way in my city because i feel that would give my city the creativeness and the 'all about the people' flare.
1- The configuration of cities changed over time by becoming more urban such as moving health care from houses to hospitals and having new inventions and more production.
ReplyDelete2- Cars was the main invention that Mr Larson claims to have changed he in how cities are brought up in e U.S.
3- Th difference between a city and a sprawl is that a city is a place of chances to get a job to create a better lifestyle , while a sprawl is the amount of growth in a particular city.
4- Mr Larson has prefer the way of how the European Cities are Built up because in Europe the towns local stores to get your daily needs are in a 20 minute radius from your place of living.
5- The new technological innovation that I was astounded by was he creation of the more new roads that where created to travel and get around.
6- The technological innovation / inventions presented in this TED talk showed cars that will fold up and create less spaceship parking lots and having less cars to create less traffic.
7- The invention that I feel that might causes a problem is that it would be going for a cheap price and some people would feel comfortable inside of one.
8- From the pasts TED talks I would think that Ms. khan and Ms Carter will agree with Mr Larson because they all are trying to do the same things to help out there community such as non dumping , stoping populations and many more.
Something I would like to add in my future city is to create more parks and stores that will be in a 10 minute radius from your living location because it would help the economy with the business and jobs and the park will be a place to relax.
1- The configuration of cities changed throughout history by becoming more urbanized than before since industrialization, such as creating more buildings and providing more transportation.
ReplyDelete2- The invention that Mr. Larson claims permanently changed the way cities were configured in the U.S. was the invention of cars; which will still continue to change the city throughout the years.
3- The difference between a city and a sprawl is that a city is a place where people choose to live and a sprawl is the uncontrolled expansion of a city.
4- Mr. Larson prefers the way European cities are configured because it has a walking distance and has faster access to the shops with no need of transportation.
5- The technological innovation that impressed me the most and helped "make cities more about people" was the roadways because it would help people travel faster.
6- The invention that will cause problems is the small car because some people might want to but them and it can cause parking problems too because the small car will be decreasing the amount of parking space that is needed to park a regular sized car.
7- The technological innovations presented in this talk will solve problems because it will decrease the amount of parking space, the amount of pollution and the amount of traffic.
8- I think Ms. Carter and Ms. Khan will agree with Mr. Larson because they are all trying to make the environment a healthier, cleaner and safer place with more modern looks.
9- The ideas I would like to implement in my city are the city homes because they are comfortable to live in; which also allow you to have your own private space and I would like to implement the small city cars too that way there is no need for the people to take long walks to where they want to go.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete1.The configuration of cities changed throughout history because in the past there was little technology and now we are more advance with technology.
ReplyDelete2.The invention that Mr.Larson said that changed the way cities in the U.S were configured was the buildings because when factories and home first came about there were not that many and now we have millions of buildings.
3.The difference between a city and a sprawl is that a city has big buildings and many jobs , it's more of a fast pace and in a sprawl area you have farms and houses , everything there is peaceful.
4.Mr.Larson perferred the way European cities were configured because everything and anything that was needed was in a walking distance.
5. I think the most technological innovation that impressed me was the apartment buildings to be able to fold your furniture and have all that space and then back to however you want it is really clever.This will help make cities more about people cause now they can choose what they like and what they want for there aparments.
6.The technological inventions address the trends occurring because now we are becoming an urbanization place , there is no more rural.It shows that in the future we would become more advance and we would perserve more things as we get along in life.
7.The inventions solve problems because now there would be less pollution if you are driving and electric car , the apartments would have more space , and the new bikes would make more people want to drive them.
8.Both Ms.Carter and Ms.Khan would agree with Mr.Larson because he is trying to perserve things and trying to make a difference in the society which they are all trying to do.Ms.Carter wanted to stop the garbage and parks , Ms.Khan wanted to build more Public spaces , and Mr.Larson wants to create a better city life. They all want to do something to help people they do not know.
9.I would like to implement alot of bike lanes bevause this helps people work out and it stops alot of pollution.
1) Configuration of cities changed thru history with advancements over time with technology city street designs etc.
ReplyDelete2) Mr Lawson claims that cars changed citites
3) The difference between a sprawl and a city is that a city is a place people choose to live for economical reasons or any other and a sprawl is the spread of company buildings where farms where
4) Mr Lawson Prefers European cities because everything needed is nearby or walking distance.
5) The mobility highway impressed me the most because as a person who loves to ride bikes space for bikers on the highway is a good idea.
6) The mini cars will trend because they save the earth with less pollution and their more convenient.
7)New technological inventions save problems because the mini cars a smaller so that mean less gas being used and less money to use on car parts
8)Ms Carter and Khan ideas are ideal to Mrs.Lawson because all ideas contribute to helping the people of their cities and communities.
9) I would add the mobility highway because i ride bikes alot.
1) The configuration of cities Change throughout history because by building more buildings and haveing more transportion for the people can get around the city.
ReplyDelete2) The invention mr.Larson claims permanently changed the way cities were configured in the us he said that cars ,bus trains Chang the way cities was configured.
3). The difference between a city and a sprawl is that a city is big with lots of people and were people wants to live. A sprawl is out the city we're is more land and space.
4) Mr Larson prefer the way European cities are configured because the towns that's in that country are walking distance so people can get to places quicker and don't have use they cars every time to pollute the air.
5). The teachnological innovations inventions impressed me the most was the new apartments they build for the people because it had moving walls in people can get around Easyer.
6). The mini mart car is the investment in technology because it can help the city a lot. By not taking up space on the streets or and the parking lots and dont pollut the air.
7). The invention that will cause problems is the the new apartments because lots of people will like to stay there but it won't be that much room in the apartments and crime might go up.
8). They all will agree with each other because in away they all trying to make the city a better and health place to stay.
9) In my city I would like to have the new min mart cars because the streets won't be that crowd with people in it will have lots space for more business.
1. The configuration of the city changed because of urbanization and industrialization. More methods of transportation and more building have been created.
ReplyDelete2. The invention Mr.Larson claimed that changed the way the cities were configured in the US is the automobile (car).
3. The difference between a city and a sprawl is: a city is a living area for people while a sprawl is an outgrowth of a population
4. Mr.Larson prefers the way European cities are configured because nothing is too far away. Every town and shopping area is in walking distance.
5. The technological innovation/invention that impressed me the most was the city homes. It was very interesting to me because it adjusted to you. It had movable furniture and it was just energy reserving.
6. The technological innovations/inventions presented in the talk address the trends occurring in cities now and in the future because of the mini car. It reduces traffic issues and makes it safer for all
7. The mini car may be the issue. The issue with this would be affordability for lower classed people.
8. I think Ms.Carter and Ms.Khan would agree with Mr.Larson’s idea because they all want to see a brighter, healthier future and they all have great ideas to get us there.
9. In my “future city” I would love to include the city homes. I feel like they are the most convient homes anyone can live in and it seems like anyone would be able to afford it.
1. The configuration of cities has changed throughout history by changing to adapt to the resident's needs. Industrialization had a large impact on the the configuration of cities. Originally, cities were very small and that is no longer true in the least. Cities were very close to natural resources. Everything was convenient and in walking distance. The home was the center of life, because there weren't any modern facilities until thousands of years later. Industrialization drastically changed this. Suddenly there were proper places to learn, get health treatment, and take care of other various other human needs instead of this taking place in the home. Cities were expanding and changing.
ReplyDelete2. Cars are the invention that Mr. Larson claims permanently changed the way cities were configured in the U.S. The car became the most popular choice of transportation in many U.S. cities. The invention and popularity of cards leads to new streets and parking lots in abundance.
3. A sprawl is the expansion of a urban area into the countryside that is disorganized and not pleasing to the eyes. A city is a large town in a urban area.
4. Mr. Larson prefers the way European cities are configured, because the cities are small villages that came together and the resources are within a walking distance from someone's home. Businesses are also spread out around the city equally.
5. The invention that impressed me the most and would help is the city car. It's a very intriguing new invention. It seems like the city car could be used by more than one person and would make an effective use of street space. It's very compact and could be efficient.
6. The technological innovations are made with the thought in mind that the population will continue to increase and more people will flock to cities. They are also being created to solve issues with space not being used effectively and trying to be more environmentally friendly. These innovations are becoming more personalized, too.
7. I believe the alternative transportation modes and customizable homes in particular are two great innovations that solve problems. The alternative transportation makes a more effective use of space, is more environmentally friendly, and might even be safer. The customizable homes make it easier to meet resident's needs, conserve energy, and use space effectively, as well.
8. I think Ms. Carter and Ms.Kahn would agree that using customizable living to conserve energy would be a good idea, because it is more environmentally friendly. I think they would both like the light in the homes automatically adjusting in particular.
9. In my future city, I would like to use the idea of customizable homes at a affordable price, because I think it would help with the issue of overcrowding and lack of space/comfort in small apartments. It also can be used to conserve energy which is always a good thing. I think it could be effective.
1. The configuration of cities has become more urbanized since industrialization with new buildings and transportation.
ReplyDelete2. Mr.Larson claims permanently cars have changed the way of the cities.
3. The difference between a city and a sprawl is where people live and a sprawl is the growth of the population in the city.
4. Mr. Larson prefer the way European cities are constructed because all of the towns are within walking distance from each other.
5. The invention that impressed me the most was the mini smart cars because it makes it easier to find parking and takes up little space. Its more about the people because it causes less pollution and allows more spaces for parking.
6. The invention presented in the talk addressing the trends occurring in cities now and in the future is the parkway; it made a green space for people to excise for joggers and bicyclists.
7. The inventions presented in this talk can solve problems but also create new problems. The mini car can solve problems by releasing less pollution but can also cause a problem because of less pollution more animals will stay creating a mass population of animals.
8. Ms. Carter and Ms. Khan agree with Mr. Larson's ideas because he’s creating more green spaces, less pollution, and everyone can be able to get to stores within a walking distance.
9. I would like to implement into my future city the idea of the new mini cars in my city its able to transform itself smaller resulting into less parking space being taking up. Also it has a sensor that will make the car stop if anything is in its way hopefully bring the accident rates down making it safer for everyone.
1.) The configuration of cities has changed throughout history because of how distant places are now. When things became industrialized, factories, hospitals, school's were centralized.
ReplyDelete2.) The invention Mr. Larson claimed permanently changed the way cities were configured in the U.S is the car. Cars have made traveling easier and faster.
3.) The difference between a city and a sprawl is that a sprawl is a large area of land covered with buildings and houses. However, a city is a large town that my have buildings and stores, and houses.
4.) Mr.Larson prefers the way European cities are configured because European cities have special lanes for a new bike invention (bike lanes)
5.) The technological innovation/invention that impressed me the most and would help "make cities more about people" was the bike lanes. Instead of biker riding in the lanes with cars, they can have their own lane. This can create less of an issue for drivers and less of a risk for bike riders.
6.) The technological innovations/inventions prevented in the address the trends occurring in cities now and in the future because of inventions such as the small smart car because it does not take up a lot of space. its easier to park with these cars because of its size. It also leaves a lot of space in parking lots.
7.) Technological innovations/ inventions, such as the mini smart car, take up less space. More space on the roads, more parking spots. In creating new problems, this invention can create traffic now that more space is provided on roads.
8.) Ms.Carter and Ms.Khan would agree with Mr. Larson's ideas because just like them, he is making the city a better place. He has contributed to the idea of more city space and bike lanes by inventing the smart bikes and smart mini cars.
9.) The idea that i would like to implement into my future city is the bike lane idea. Instead of bike riders riding in lanes with drivers, they will have a separate lane made for bikes. This can reduce the amount of bicycle accidents on the roads. This would also be relief to drivers.
- Jazmin Dandy
1. The configuration of cities changed throughout history by depending on technology to do their work for them and even more depending on people wanting to move to the city due to urbanization.
ReplyDelete2. The invention of cars was the invention that changed the ways cities were configured in the U.S.
3. The difference between a city and sprawl is that cities are where people settle down on their decision while sprawls are uncontrolled expanding.
4. Mr. Larson prefers the way European cities are configured because when you are in the small areas of the city you would most likely run into many stores such as shops, cafes, restaurants and grocery stores.
5. The technological innovation that impressed me the most was the new mobility parkway. This would be a healthier environment for people and it’s also a space where people could settle down and relax, and it wouldn’t be an eye sore for people to look at. I think this helps back up that this innovation makes cities more about people.
6. The technological inventions presented in the talk addresses the trends occurring in cities now and in the future by decreasing traffic situations and making traffic problems lowered for everyone around.
7. The innovations solve these problems by increasing the amount of parking space for areas with a lot of apartments since areas with a lot of apartments tend to hold a bit of traffic problems. These help people with settling in cities they want to live in.
8. The extent Ms. Carter would agree with Mr. Larson’s ideas would agree on are making “greener” areas. At one point in their Ted Talks they talk about being a greener for example Ms. Carter’s ideas focused on getting the south Bronx to become greener. Mr.Larson and Ms. Khan would agree on is brining storefronts business.
9. Some ideas I would implement on my city would be mobility parks. I think having an attractive greener area can attract more people and get people to focus on fitness with the bike rides. Most of the people of my city would look fit and healthy.
1. The configuration of cities changed throughout history by adding more And more transportation and buildings. In other words, the city has became more urbanized.
ReplyDelete2.Mr larson claims that cars changed the cities in the U.S.
3.The difference between a city and a sprawl is a city, is a unique place where people would want to live. On the other hand a sprawl is an massive growth of the population so that city is massively over populated.
4.mr larson prefers the way European cities are configured because there's walking distance in each community.
5.The technological invention that impressed me the most was the highway bridges. It's impressive me the most because people can over water by car, or they can walk, jog, or ride their bike in the middle of the bridge for example the Brooklyn bridge. I believe that's more about the people in the city.
6.the smaller car would be a good invention for future cities because it creates more parking in sprawl cities like NewYork.
7.Thesetechnological invention are good for the future but can be very dangerous because not a lot of people would believe in this future. So if the government would force these decisions, many people wouldn't like it like the small car for instance , and it would cause problems.
8.i believe ms carter and ms khan would agree with mr Larson because he believes like they believe, into making greener cities.
9. My idea that I would like to put in is a more a more greener city. I believe when it comes to an over populated city, we should ride more bikes and walk a lot instead of driving and in the future we could look more like Amsterdam because they barely drive cars in that city.
Chicaya Jones
ReplyDelete1 – The Configuration of cities has changed throughout history because we’ve been leaning more towards urbanization. For an example we have more buildings and cities and technology has also helped to push along this process of urbanization.
2 – He claimed that cars have changed our cities.
3 – A city is the main base where people first start out and choose to move into for opportunity’s, a sprawl is what happens when the city starts expanding and people have no choice but to move into the places provided for them and take what they can get.
4 – Mr. Larson prefers European cities because he believes that they are more convenient and constructed better, for an example in European cities a lot of things are within walking distance of your home.
5 – The Invention that impressed me the most was the moving ‘walls’ in buildings. I really believe that would help people with spacing issues, for an example you could take a large bedroom, divide it in half and voila! You have two bedrooms.
6 – The Inventions address trends in occurring cities now and in the future by providing things the cities need, for an example smaller cars. Each and every one of the inventions can help make a city better and run smoothly.
7 – Like I said in question six smaller cars. With Smaller calls there can be less traffic and more parking spots available due to the fact that you won’t have large cars taking up potential spots that could fit two cars.
8 – The all agree on the ideal of creating more parks and taking care of the surroundings to make people more comfortable.
9 – I would use one of Mr. Larson’s favorite and use the design of the European cities. It’s convenient and applying it in my life I personally would want something like that in my own city instead of having to drive everywhere.
1. the city has changed because it as become more advanced with their inventions.
ReplyDelete2.the car has changed the US tremendously because it allows people to travel where and when they want.
3. a city is an area with a large population where people choose to live wherever they want.
4.larson prefers the european city because, everything is walking distance so it is more convenient.
5. the invention that impressed me the most was the high line. this is because it is just so beautiful and amazing how someone just took and old railway and made it into that. i would love to go see it one day in person and experience the real thing.
6. the theme of the talk today was whats happening present time and whats going to happen in the future because we keep advancing who knows maybe the flying cars will happen.
7. these innovations can solve problems because there is a decline in traffic.
8. i think everyone who agree with larson because they are trying to revamp our cities.
9. i would use the high line or create something like that so the people in the city have something to take in and enjoy
1) Cities always change depending on the technology available at that very time.
ReplyDelete2) Technology played a big part in the changing of cities for example trains, railroads, and skyscrapers. Some even say cars are the main reason why cities changed.
3) The city is a place that every country or state has one or many that has a large population, but all the people choose whether to live there but a sprawl is when the population is explosive.
4) He likes European Cities because everything is able to access and get to and everybody could interact.
5) Out of all the ideas the skyline is my favorite, I feel that a city isn't complete without a beautiful skyline to be hovering under the sunset.
6) All these inventions are really showing people that some cities are trying to change the environment.
7) Hopefully these new technological inventions are trying to decrease the clutter in the streets and with the traffic to keep the city streets clean and more people will able to walk on them.
8) I think they would agree because all three of them sort of have the same concept of making the city streets cleaner and more safe for the future.
9) I think the smaller car would probably be the closet I feel like a lot of more people would be outside enjoying what nature has to offer.
The configuration has changed throughout history with the city has changed it beacame with more invitations
ReplyDeleteThe invitations of transportation using cars have changed the cities
The differences between a sprawl and a city is a place that someone wants to live in
Sprawl is the changed growth population that is popualted cities
Ms. lawson have changed the cities trandomsly creating alot of opportunities for owners to start their own buisness with alot of stores
Technological innovations is creating alot of bikes in the bike lanes so people could get place to place
The bikes made these problems made it less to create problems there was no more traffic
I think that they would agree because Ms.Larson idea made it no problems in the streets having no traffic
Yes i would use Ms.Larson idea in my cities it is making the cities way better and safer for people . That i think the people would enjoy themselves being safe and enjoyable in the streets using all the transportation
1.) City design changes due to the environment. It depends on the location you are at and the surroundings of the environment and of the people. Climate changes and everything, so Mother Nature is always changing, before you start, make sure you know what you are building on or around.
ReplyDelete2.) Mr. Larson states that the cars have changed and will continue to change the cities.
3.) A city itself is busy area. A place for peoples living and job opportunities. A sprawl is growth in population in a specific city.
4.) Mr. Larson prefers European cities better because all the resources are close to you. You can walk or ride a bike there instead of driving and wasting gas there. He uses Paris as an example made up of villages as his proof to what he means.
5.) The walkway bridge is safe because people can cross it with their families safer. They will be sure to make it to the other side of the walkway bridge also.
6.) The cars are going to become a huge part of or society. Those cars will be taking up less space than others. If one regular car parking spot get replaced and 2 or 3 of these new cars can get parked there, isn't that great.
7.) The new cars will save up more space. Instead of one car parking there can be 2. The space is being used up correctly. That's one problem that's been solved.
8.) They would all agree on the idea of the environmental awareness. They all want the same problem to be solved in different ways. They all want to go "green". The three of them can work hard to give the same advise to others to go "green". One can always make a difference.
9.) I would use the idea of the new cars in my future city. I would use that because you have closer resouces, less gas, it's walkable or bike-able distance. It is good for the environment and for your fitness.
- Navdeep Singh
1- The configuration of cities has changed because of more urbanization with new buildings and transportation
ReplyDelete2- He claims that cars changed everything because it makes it easier to get to get to different places.
3- a city and sprawl is that cities are where people want to live while sprawls are uncontrolled expanding
4- He likes it better because in Europe all the resources are closer to you and it is less traveling
5- The Invention that impressed me the most are the moving walls because that can stop a lot of spacing issues that people have and it will make an area more comfy to be in
6- The new inventions are making room to fit more people in one area like the moving wall is trying to put more things in one space while still living comfy
7- they want to save more space with the new inventions because it is becoming more populated and we need to save space.
8- They are both trying to achievements of going greener
9- I can use this idea by things about spacing in my city because that might being an issue trying to fit all the people in one place.
1. the configuration of cities changed throughout history by the change in the advancement in technology.
ReplyDelete2. the invention that Mr.Larson claim permanently changed the way cities were configured in the US is cars
3. the difference between a city and a sprawl is city is more of a crowded place, and sprawl is when the population is too much.
4. Mr. Larson prefer the way European cities are configured because everything is in the walking distance.
5. I think the most technological innovation that impressed me was the apartment buildings to be able to fold your furniture and have all that space and then back to however you want it is really clever.This will help make cities more about people cause now they can choose what they like and what they want for there apartments.
6. The mini cars will trend because they save the earth with less pollution and their more fuel- efficient.
7. New technological inventions save problems because the mini cars a smaller so that mean less gas being used and less money to use on car parts.
8. Ms.Carter and Ms.khan would agree with Mr.Larson because they all want to go green.
9. .I would like to implement a lot of bike lanes because this helps people work out and it stops a lot of pollution. and also increase in fuel- efficient transportation.
1. How has the configuration of cities changed throughout history?
ReplyDeleteConfiguration of cities have changed throughout history because as you should notice, industrialization has played a huge part in how and where buildings are now built/placed.
2. Which invention does Mr.Larson claim permanently changed the way cities were configured in the US?
The automobile, because of how much easier it made transportation, getting from point A to point B.
3. What is the difference between a city and a sprawl?
A city is a large town, with areas that help and improve living, such as businesses and educational facilities
meanwhile a sprawl is quite similar, just less organized and unplanned, usually more spread out and uneven.
4. Why does Mr. Larson prefer the way European cities are configured? Explain.
He prefers the way European cities are configured because of how everything is in walking distance which is safer and healthier for the environment, as well as the people residing in the area.
5. Which technological innovation/ invention impressed you the most and would help "make cities more about people"? Explain.
I was impressed by the robotic walls, simply because of its design and how it works. I personally would not use them, but they are good for making cities more about people because it allows more to be done in one space, and can bring more to the table, such as another bed for another guest and such.
6. How do the technological innovations/ inventions presented in the talk address the trends occurring in cities now and in the future?
The inventions shrink the rate of traffic, make traveling more convenient and better for the environment.
7. To what extent do the technological innovations/ inventions presented in this talk solve problems? or create new problems?
They solve problems while creating more, in the sense that you cannot please everyone. other than that they please many and do solve problems pertaining to congestion and appearance.
8. To what extent would Ms. Carter and Ms. Khan agree or disagree with Mr. Larson's ideas? Explain using details from all the talks.
I think they would agree to the full extent, if not, then at least a majority of the extent because of how similar their ideas and goals are for bettering cities and making them healthier.
9. Which ideas would you like to implement into your "future city"? Why?
I would like to implement the idea of making everything nearby, this way it saves people time and makes things easier for the citizens of my city, and they may even recommend living here to outsiders if the outsiders like convenience.
1. The configuration of cities has changed overtime thanks to the power of industrialization and urbanization. With these two processes cities have expanded and grown exponentially over time.
ReplyDelete2. The automobile, without a doubt. This has granted us so much mobility, and narrowed the gap between distances.
3. A sprawl is a small, remote town, away from central urban areas. A city however is a much bigger town, harboring all our basic needs, many opportunities like jobs and so forth.
4. In European cities, everything is in walking distance of each other. Which means you don't have to rely much on the automobile. Less automobile usage = healthier city.
5. The walkway bridges really impressed me, the ability for the bridge to create bike lands and walking space is amazing. Motorists, bikers, joggers, everyone is equal to this bridge.
6. The tiny car (compact car) provides more space on the road. With cars like these, traffic will be a lot lighter, and parking spaces will be easier to find.
7. Going back to the compact car, gas usage is really high on these types of cars.You'll be spending a lot of money on gas, and it will burn a hole in your pocket. Also, not to mention cars cause pollution.
8. Ms. Khan would definitely agree with the TED Talker, because this man is all about positive ideals, and helping the environment; something Ms. Khan does daily. Unfortunately I don't know who Ms. Carter is but I believe she'll follow the same ideals as Ms. Khan.
9. I would implement windmills and parks into my city. Green power or no power. I wouldn't be damaging the environment and almost everyone would be happy.
1. the configuration of cities changed throughout history by the change in the advancement in technology.
ReplyDelete2. the invention that Mr.Larson claim permanently changed the way cities were configured in the US is cars
3. the difference between a city and a sprawl is city is more of a crowded place, and sprawl is when the population is too much.
4. Mr. Larson prefer the way European cities are configured because everything is in the walking distance.
5. I think the most technological innovation that impressed me was the apartment buildings to be able to fold your furniture and have all that space and then back to however you want it is really clever.This will help make cities more about people cause now they can choose what they like and what they want for there apartments.
6. The mini cars will trend because they save the earth with less pollution and their more fuel- efficient.
7. New technological inventions save problems because the mini cars a smaller so that mean less gas being used and less money to use on car parts.
8. Ms.Carter and Ms.khan would agree with Mr.Larson because they all want to go green.
9. .I would like to implement a lot of bike lanes because this helps people work out and it stops a lot of pollution. and also increase in fuel- efficient transportation.
1. the configuration of cities where more useful for transportation and buildings throughout the history
ReplyDelete2. Mr.gruson claimed that the cars changed the cities
3. the difference between a city and a sprawl , is that city is a place we choose to live and a sprawl is the growth of the population.
4. Mr.Lawson prefers european cities because the distance of the town and the location is closer to shops .
5. the invention that impressed me the most was the non stop making of rodes.
6. mini smart cars it will help you a lot because the will be less pollution in the air.
7. the compact car because gas is more money and burns out quicker.
8.Ms.carter and Ms.khan would argue with with Mr.lawson because they both talk about the environment.
9.i would use the idea of cars because it would bring less polution and it would be more easier to get around more so because it would be less traffic.
-QUALESE BARNES
1) The configuration of cities Change throughout history because by building more buildings and haveing more transportion for the people can get around the city.
ReplyDelete2) The invention mr.Larson claims permanently changed the way cities were configured in the us he said that cars ,bus trains Chang the way cities was configured.
3). The difference between a city and a sprawl is that a city is big with lots of people and were people wants to live. A sprawl is out the city we're is more land and space.
4) Mr Larson prefer the way European cities are configured because the towns that's in that country are walking distance so people can get to places quicker and don't have use they cars every time to pollute the air.
5). The teachnological innovations inventions impressed me the most was the new apartments they build for the people because it had moving walls in people can get around Easyer.
6). The mini mart car is the investment in technology because it can help the city a lot. By not taking up space on the streets or and the parking lots and dont pollut the air.
7). The invention that will cause problems is the the new apartments because lots of people will like to stay there but it won't be that much room in the apartments and crime might go up.
8). They all will agree with each other because in away they all trying to make the city a better and health place to stay.
9) In my city I would like to have the new min mart cars because the streets won't be that crowd with people in it will have lots space for more business.